Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Allen v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 14, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6977Published

1Concurrence

MEYERSON, Presiding Judge,

specially concurring:

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that under Sheldrick a putative father may not bring an action to establish his paternity. Although constitutional arguments were not raised in Sheldrick, Traphagan, or in this case, it is the constitutional implications of these decisions which prompt me to write this special concurring opinion. For the reasons stated below, I believe that a statute which precludes a father from establishing his paternity violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the fourteenth amendment.

In Stanley v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Slawek v. StrohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API