Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Thomas & Thomas Development Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1997No. 95-1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

The tragic facts of this case are not in dispute. Nelson Weiss was killed when his house exploded on March 21, 1991. The issue before us is whether the grants of summary judgment in favor of all defendants were proper. *277We conclude that the grant of summary judgment in favor of Dry Hole was improper because Dry Hole owed Weiss a duty of due care. We find that the duty owed is a high one because of the dangerousness of the commodity and the industry-known hazards associated with dirty gas. We conclude that the grants of summary judgment in favor of Thomas & Thomas, Leahey, and Gempel were…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co. v. First Congregational ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. St. Marys Gas Co. v. BrodbeckOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Suiter v. Ohio Valley Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. David v. Oxy USA, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  2. Wood v. MAK Invest. Properties, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Weiss v. Thomas & Thomas Dev. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Weiss v. Thomas & Thomas Dev. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API