Trenton Trust Co. v. Klausman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Packel, J.,
This controversy involves the liability of the appellees, Mark and Michael Klausman, on a note executed by their corporation, The Shoe Back, Inc., payable to the bank appellant.1 The instrument was endorsed as follows:
*402“Mark Klausman, Sec.
Lionel Klausman, Vice Pres.
Michael Klausman, Pres.
The Shoe Rack
Mark Klausman, Sec.”
The appellant’s complaints asserted that the appellees endorsed in their personal capacities. The appellees by preliminary objections contended they endorsed the note in their representative capacities as officers of The Shoe Rack and that therefore the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dormont Savings & Trust Co. v. KommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Elkay Manufacturing Co. v. Chasco Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. PlotkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Schwab v. McDonald (In Re LMcD, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- United American Bank of Memphis v. First Citizens National Bank of DyersburgCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- In Re KonidarisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Robinson Thread Co. v. Easy Line-Arts, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.