Legal Opinion

Trenton Trust Co. v. Klausman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1972No. Appeals, 1013 and 1085PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Packel, J.,

This controversy involves the liability of the appellees, Mark and Michael Klausman, on a note executed by their corporation, The Shoe Back, Inc., payable to the bank appellant.1 The instrument was endorsed as follows:

*402“Mark Klausman, Sec.

Lionel Klausman, Vice Pres.

Michael Klausman, Pres.

The Shoe Rack

Mark Klausman, Sec.”

The appellant’s complaints asserted that the appellees endorsed in their personal capacities. The appellees by preliminary objections contended they endorsed the note in their representative capacities as officers of The Shoe Rack and that therefore the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dormont Savings & Trust Co. v. KommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Elkay Manufacturing Co. v. Chasco Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. PlotkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Schwab v. McDonald (In Re LMcD, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. United American Bank of Memphis v. First Citizens National Bank of DyersburgCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. In Re KonidarisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Robinson Thread Co. v. Easy Line-Arts, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API