Legal Opinion

Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Erratt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Cheboygan; Adams, J. Bill by the Yan Cleve Glass Company against William Erratt, George Hughes, Henry M. Airth, and Joseph Kesseler to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The defendant Kesseler, in the summer of 1S94, erected a store building upon his land in Cheboygan. One Tuttle was employed by him to superintend the erection of the building, and to purchase materials *690for its construction. Defendants Erratt and Hughes were copartners, under the firm name of Erratt & Co., engaged in the retail hardware business in Cheboygan. Complainant was a corporation, organized under the laws of Ohio, and engaged in the business of wholesaling plate and window glass in Cleveland, in that State. Tuttle ordered of Erratt. & Co. plate glass designed to be used in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willard v. MagoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Stout v. SawyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darknell v. Coeur D'Alene & St. Joe Transportation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Ivorydale Lumber Co. v. Cincinnati Union Terminal Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. People ex rel. Emack v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API