Legal Opinion

Deering v. United States

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided November 29, 2016No. CIVIL NO. 16-1655 (PG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER

JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the court is petitioner Daniel Deering’s (“petitioner”, or “Deering”) motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Docket No. 1), and the United States’ (“respondent” or the “government”) opposition thereto (Docket No. 17). In addition, the petitioner has filed a motion requesting that a pretrial conference be set, followed by an evidentiary hearing or, alternatively, an oral argument. See Docket No. 24. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES petitioner’s…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mojica-Garay v. United StatesUnited States District Court · 2018
  2. Watkins v. MedeirosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API