Beard v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Held, petitioners are not entitled to exclude disability annuity payments from income under sec. 105, I.R.C. 1954.
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. BEARD AND KATHLEEN T. BEARD, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Beard v. Commissioner
Docket No. 22033-80.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1984-24; 1984 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 651; 47 T.C.M. (CCH) 911; T.C.M. (RIA) 84024;
January 11, 1984.
Held, petitioners are not entitled to exclude disability annuity payments from income under sec. 105, I.R.C. 1954.
James R. Beard, pro se.
Marion S. Friedman, for the respondent.
WHITAKER
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
WHITAKER, Judge: The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $817 in the petitioners' Federal income tax for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haar v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Daniel S. And Emma F. Haar v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Pearson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981