Legal Opinion

Beard v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 11, 1984No. Docket No. 22033-80Unpublished

Held, petitioners are not entitled to exclude disability annuity payments from income under sec. 105, I.R.C. 1954.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. BEARD AND KATHLEEN T. BEARD, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Beard v. Commissioner

Docket No. 22033-80.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1984-24; 1984 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 651; 47 T.C.M. (CCH) 911; T.C.M. (RIA) 84024;

January 11, 1984.

Held, petitioners are not entitled to exclude disability annuity payments from income under sec. 105, I.R.C. 1954.

James R. Beard, pro se.

Marion S. Friedman, for the respondent.

WHITAKER

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

WHITAKER, Judge: The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $817 in the petitioners' Federal income tax for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haar v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. Daniel S. And Emma F. Haar v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  3. Pearson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API