Loeb v. Loeb

*102Dissenting Opinion

Givan, J.

I dissent from the majority opinion for the following reasons:

1. The opinion of the Court appears to be based entirely upon the proposition that evidence was erroneously admitted concerning conditions prior to August 25,1966, the same being the date of a prior order for custody and support. It is apparently the majority opinion’s position that it was reversible error for the trial court to hear any evidence other than evidence of a change in the condition subsequent to August 25, 1966. However, the opinion does not cite any authority for this position. In fact, the…