Legal Opinion

Carmack v. Reynolds

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2017No. S224985PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiu, J.

*847 Under the terms of a spendthrift trust established by his parents, defendant Rick H. Reynolds is entitled to receive over a million dollars, all to be *848 paid out of trust principal. Reynolds filed for bankruptcy before the trust's first payment, and the bankruptcy trustee seeks to determine what interest the bankruptcy estate has in the trust. The trust is governed by California law, and as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit observed, the relevant statutory provisions are "opaque." ( Frealy v. Reynolds (9th Cir. 2015) 779 F.3d 1028 , 1029 ( Frealy ).) Probate Code…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Seymour v. McAvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. James Steinle v. City and County of S.F.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Int'l Bhd. of Boilermakers v. Nassco Holdings Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. People v. AguayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API