Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parker v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1996No. 95-1134Published

1DissentRobert L. Brown, Justice

It is difficult to conceive of what could be more significant in bad-faith litigation than for an insured to be able to determine how other insureds in the same situation were treated by the carrier. The majority has decided that this information is not pertinent and that Parker in this case must give absolute credence to the carrier’s representation that uniform procedures relating to cancellations were followed in this case. I disagree. The essence of litigation is proof— not representations by an adversary of what should have been done. Parker ought not to be bound by what Farm Bureau…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marrow v. State Farm InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Rickett v. HayesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Ashmore v. FordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Heinrich v. Harp's Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API