Legal Opinion
Rumbin v. Association of American Medical Colleges
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 21, 2011No. Civil No. 3:08cv983 (JBA)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Peter Charles Rumbin filed suit pro se against Defendant Association of American Medical Colleges (“AAMC”) under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181. He claims that he reported to Defendant that he was severely limited in the major life activities of seeing and reading, but his requests for accommodations in taking the Medical College Admission Test (“MCAT”), administered by Defendant, *85were unlawfully denied. A bench trial was held on Plaintiffs claims in June 2010.
I. Procedural…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Patane v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martinez v. CONNECTICUT, STATE LIBRARYDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Floyd v. LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Kennedy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Rawdin v. American Board of PediatricsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Healy v. National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.