Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Matthews

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1983No. Docket No. 61146Published

1DissentM. F. Cavanagh, P.J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that all the essential elements of the crime of false pretenses were present in this case.

Following a preliminary examination, defendants were bound over for trial on the charge of obtaining money over the value of $100 by false pretenses, in violation of MCL 750.218; MSA 28.415. The trial court subsequently denied the defendants’ motion to quash the information and dismiss the charges. This Court granted the defendants’ application for leave to take a delayed interlocutory appeal.

At the preliminary examination, the complainant testified…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DossMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. KubasiakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. LarcoMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. CageMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. PhebusMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API