Legal Opinion

BMH Realty Ltd. v. 399 East 72nd Street Owners, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 2, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered January 11, 1995, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There is no merit to plaintiff’s contention that the correspondence between the parties constituted a binding agreement. Indeed, the documents themselves make clear that the parties did not intend to be bound until a formal agreement was executed (see, Brause v Goldman, 10 AD2d 328, 332-333, affd 9 NY2d 620). Nor was defendant required to make a good faith effort to prepare and deliver a formal written agreement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brause v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. Brause v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Bernstein v. FelskeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jericho Group, Ltd. v. Midtown Development, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Yenom Corp. v. 155 Wooster Street Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Michael Coppel Promotions Pty. Ltd. v. BoltonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. Snyder v. Isabella Geriatric Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Zohar v. 3 West 16th Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API