Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CBA Industries, Inc. v. Circulation Management, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 13, 1992Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Ritter, J.,
concurs in part and dissents in part, and votes to modify the order and judgment, on the law, by deleting the *617second and third decretal paragraphs thereof, and substituting therefor a provision confirming so much of the arbitrator’s award as directed the defendants to pay the plaintiff's attorneys’ fees, with the following memorandum, in which Miller, J., concurs: The dispute underlying this appeal arises from the sale of a business which distributed advertising circulars by inserting them in newspapers delivered in Long Island. The contract of sale fixed a purchase price of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Muzak Corp. v. Hotel Taft Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- In Re the Arbitration Between National Cash Register Co. & WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Grossman v. Laurence Handprints-N.J., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Cowen & Co. v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.