Legal Opinion
Trienco, Inc. v. Applied Theory, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 5, 1990No. CV86-0428; CA A51220PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiff for $63,000 plus prejudgment interest from August 5, 1982. We affirm. Plaintiff filed a notice of cross-appeal but has not pursued it. We dismiss it as abandoned.
In our earlier opinion, Trienco, Inc. v. Applied Theory, Inc., 91 Or App 588, 756 P2d 66 (1988), we reversed the judgment that had dismissed plaintiffs action for breach of contract after a court trial, held that the parties had made a contract and remanded for further proceedings. We set out these facts:
“Plaintiff is a Colorado corporation which designs and manufactures an optical scanning…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Snyder v. Herbert Greenbaum & Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Gerber v. O'DONNELLCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Stanfill v. TAT (U.S.A.) Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Trienco, Inc. v. Applied Theory, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Purina Mills, L.L.C. v. LessDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- USF Reddaway, Inc. v. Teamsters Union, Local 162District Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Evergreen International Airlines, Inc. v. Asiana AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Gulf Insurance Company v. International Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Gulf Insurance Company v. International Surplus Lines Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994