Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Cronin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the District Court of Elmore County. Honorable Lyttleton Price, Judge. Action to compel performance of contract. Judgment for plaintiff. The facts in regard to the Chinaman’s lease and the purchase of this property by Greenburg are as follows: On the eighth day of September, 1897, the defendant rented this property to Lou Sing Lee for a term of ten years, and he went into possession thereunder and conducted, and still conducts, a Chinese laundry thereon.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the District Court of Elmore County. Honorable Lyttleton Price, Judge. Action to compel performance of contract. Judgment for plaintiff. The facts in regard to the Chinaman’s lease and the purchase of this property by Greenburg are as follows: On the eighth day of September, 1897, the defendant rented this property to Lou Sing Lee for a term of ten years, and he went into possession thereunder and conducted, and still conducts, a Chinese laundry thereon. On the first day of October, 1901, at which time the defendant, J. C. Cronin, was living at Monument, Utah, Mr. Greenburg wrote…

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— This action was brought by the respondent as plaintiff against the appellants. The contract that is sought to be enforced was entered into on the fifteenth day of October, 1901, between the appellants Cronin and wife and one Greenburg. By ■ the terms of said contract said Cronin and wife agreed to sell and convey to said Green-burg three certain town lots in the town of Mountainhome, for $1000, payable as follows: $200 cash, $400 in six months, and $400 in twelve months from the date of said contract, which payments were to be made to the Citizens’ State Bank of Mountainhome. The said…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Papesh v. WagnonIdaho Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API