Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Dixon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Monroe county; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding. This was an action for slander, brought by the appellee against the appellant. The declaration contained two counts.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Monroe county; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding. This was an action for slander, brought by the appellee against the appellant. The declaration contained two counts. In the first count, the slanderous words charged to have been spoken by the defendant, were, “ that Sarah B. Dixon, meaning plaintiff, was in the family way by James Wallace, meaning his son James Wallace, and that her mother, meaning Mrs. Ruth Dixon, had driven her, meaning Sarah B. Dixon, from her home, meaning her, the plaintiff’s, home, living with her mother, Mrs. Ruth Dixon, for the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bbeese

This was case, for slander, brought by Sarah B. Dixon, plaintiff, and against William W. Wallace, defendant.

There were two counts in the declaration, and the general issue and three special pleas were pleaded. A trial was had, and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff, for one thousand dollars, one half of which was remitted by plaintiff.

The point is made, on this appeal by the defendant, that the proofs do not sustain the charge in the several counts of the declaration, nor in either of them.

We have examined the declaration and the evidence in connection therewith, and fail to find the charge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sanford v. GaddisIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  2. Delatine v. KramerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API