Legal Opinion

Marchand v. Nazzaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

Petitioner (hereinafter the mother) and respondent (hereinafter the father) are the parents of two daughters, bom in 1997 and 1999. The falling apart of their relationship has resulted in myriad proceedings (see e.g. Matter of Marchand v Nazzaro, 55 AD3d 968, 968 [2008]). As currently relevant, the mother petitioned and the father cross-petitioned for custody of the children. Temporary orders that were issued while the custody proceedings were pending granted the mother sole legal and physical custody of the children, with six to eight hours per week of visitation for the father. Following…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nicotera v. NicoteraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Smith v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Hissam v. MackinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Holle v. HolleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Wentland v. RousseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Torkildsen v. TorkildsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Braswell v. BraswellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Melissa K. v. Brian K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Schneider v. LascherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Moor v. MoorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API