Legal Opinion

Martin v. Jerks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1936No. 11018PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

A suit was instituted for specific performance of an alleged contract. A third person filed an intervention. A demurrer interposed by the defendant was overruled. The plaintiff dismissed the main action. The case was tried on the intervention. At the conclusion of evidence a nonsuit was granted, and the intervenor excepted. Held, that the intervention was subject to the fate of the main case, which having been dismissed, the intervention necessarily failed, whether or not it was supported by evidence. Consequently the judge did not err in granting a nonsuit.

The ease differs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eastmore v. BunkleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haisten v. TANNER-BRICE COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API