Legal Opinion

Hylton v. Hines

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1922No. 23,528PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Morris district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.

The plaintiff shipped ninety-one head of cattle about April 1, 1918, from Duñlap, Kan., to Kansas City, Kan., over the defendant’s road. The contract of shipment contained a provision that, as a condition precedent to the right to recover for any loss or damages resulting from shrinkage in weight while the stock was in the possession of the carrier, the shipper should in writing give notice to the conductor in charge of the train or to the nearest freight agent before the car should leave the carriers’ lines and before the cattle should mingle…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Ray v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Hayes v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Giles v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Achen v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API