Legal Opinion
Blatman v. Paribas North America, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 23, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered February 12, 1993, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the fifth, seventh and eighth causes of action in the plaintiffs amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this action brought to recover for wrongful discharge, the fifth cause of action was properly dismissed, since it seeks recovery of the same bonus payment for which an accounting was sought in the fourth cause of action, and, therefore, fails to state a separate viable claim…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rock v. Sear-Brown Associates, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Rosini v. CunananAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Rosini v. CunananNew York Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mariani v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Tramontozzi v. St. Francis CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996