Legal Opinion

Reese v. Brinkley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1922No. 13371Published

Complaint; from Warren superior court — Judge Shurley. January 28, 1922.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “ In a suit upon a forthcoming bond, the only question to be decided is whether or not there has been a breach of the bond. Ho issue can properly be raised as to the title of the property involved.” McFarland v. Lee, 10 Ga. App. 698 (2) (73 S. E. 1091), and citation.

2. In a suit upon a forthcoming bond, proof that the defendant (the principal on the bond) refused, upon demand, to deliver the property which has been found subject, shows a breach of the bond. This is true although it was recited in the bond that the property wras to be forthcoming at the time and place of sale, and the proof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McFarland v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Stinson v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API