State ex rel. Saragusa v. Ott
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Lena Saragusa was convicted of operating a blind tiger, and applied to the judge of the Twenty-Sixth district court for the parish of Washington for writ of mandamus to compel granting of an appeal by C. Ellis Ott, Judge of the City Court, and, her application having been refused, she applies for writs of certiorari and mandamus to compel action by tbe district court.
1Opinion of the CourtDawkins, J.
Lena Saragusa was convicted in, the city court for the city of Bogalusa, La., of operating a “blind tiger,” and asked for orders of appeal, which were denied, and she then applied to the judge of the Twenty-Sixth district court for the parish of Washington for a writ of mandamus to compel the granting of the appeal. The district court having refused her application on that score, she applies to this court for writs of certiorari and mandamus to compel action on the part of that tribunal.
The answer to the rule nisi issued herein admits the. refusal of the city judge to grant an appeal in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Durand v. Parish Judge of St. Martin ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- State ex rel. Strauss v. DubucletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873
- Gilmore v. BrenhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
- Allen, Nugent & Co. v. CarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- DeGruy v. Joseph A. Aikens & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nylka Land Co. v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Godchaux Sugars, Inc. v. OckmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- City of New Orleans v. Canal Bakery & DelicatessenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925