Commonwealth v. Brasher
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
HOWERTON, Judge.
The Commonwealth appeals from an order running Darren Brasher’s sentence in 90-CR-1295 concurrently with a prior sentence in 89-CR-1395. The Commonwealth argues that KRS 533.060(3) requires that the sentence in the second conviction run consecutively with the prior offense. Although we are well aware that the legislature has provided greater penalties for persons who commit multiple offenses, we nevertheless must conclude that the plain language of KRS 533.060(3) provides a gap which makes the statute inapplicable to Brasher’s situation. KRS 532.110(1) is therefore applicable,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bailey v. ReevesKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
- Handley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983
- Rose v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cosby v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Pearce v. University of Louisville ex rel. Board of TrusteesKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Moore v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Stogner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
- Cosby v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.