Legal Opinion

Geeter v. Pollard

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 24, 2025No. 3:20-cv-02188Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JAMAR RASHAD GEETER, 10 Case No. 20-cv-02188-RS Petitioner, 11 v. ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR 12 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, 13 Respondent. 14 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Petitioner seeks federal habeas relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

from his state convictions. 18 Following an order granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss certain claims in the Petitioner’s First 19 Amended Petition (“FAP”), four claims remain. Because these claims lack merit, the petition is 20 denied. 21 II. BACKGROUND 22 The following…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API