Legal Opinion

Williams v. Fort Pierce Tribune & Claims Center

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 7, 1995No. 82409PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have for review a district court decision certifying the following questions to be of great public importance:

WHETHER,' IN LIGHT OF THE EVOLVING BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS AND PERSONS DELIVERING NEWSPAPERS, THE HOLDING IN MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO. v. KENDALL, 88 So.2d 276 (Fla.1956), REMAINS VIABLE?

IF THE DECISION IN MIAMI HERALD REMAINS VIABLE, IS ITS APPLICATION LIMITED TO TORT ACTIONS FOR DAMAGES, OR DOES IT *175EXTEND AS WELL TO WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CASES?

Fort Pierce Tribune v. Williams, 622 So.2d 1368, 1368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miami Herald Publishing Company v. KendallSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Fort Pierce Tribune v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fort Pierce Tribune v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API