Mahler v. Tampax, Inc.

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

Because a review of the record convinces us that a Workers’ Compensation Commissioner based his decision dismissing Suzzann R. Mahler’s petition for compensation on a “misapprehension of undoubted facts,”1 we feel compelled to sustain her appeal from the pro forma decree of the Superior Court adopting that decision.

Beyond summarizing the procedural background, the commissioner’s entire reference to the facts and his conclusions thereon was as follows:

“It is noted that the testimony of Dr. K. Kuck, emergency physician at St. Mary’s General Hospital relates to examination…