Bradbury v. Oklahoma State Board of Chiropody
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice:
This appeal involves an action brought by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as the “Board”, and/or “plaintiff”, to enjoin plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as “defendant”, from unlawfully engaging in the practice of Chiropody in violation of Title 59, O.S.1961, §§ 136-159.5, both inclusive, which State law requires, among other things, that persons practicing that profession in this State have a license to do so, issued annually by said Board.
Defendant’s first Oklahoma license to practice Chiropody was issued in 1958. He thereafter renewed it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Black v. GeisslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- City of Shawnee v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Moore, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company, a Railroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Oklahoma Education Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma LegislatureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Chrysler Corp. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Buxton v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982