Legal Opinion

Bradbury v. Oklahoma State Board of Chiropody

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 26, 1971No. 43674PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice:

This appeal involves an action brought by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as the “Board”, and/or “plaintiff”, to enjoin plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as “defendant”, from unlawfully engaging in the practice of Chiropody in violation of Title 59, O.S.1961, §§ 136-159.5, both inclusive, which State law requires, among other things, that persons practicing that profession in this State have a license to do so, issued annually by said Board.

Defendant’s first Oklahoma license to practice Chiropody was issued in 1958. He thereafter renewed it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Black v. GeisslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. City of Shawnee v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Moore, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company, a Railroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Oklahoma Education Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma LegislatureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Buxton v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API