Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1918No. 9129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. 'July 27, 1917. .

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. Where there is an acknowledgment of service of a bill of

exceptions as provided by law, the bill of exceptions may be amended in the reviewing court by adding, as a party defendant iu error to the cause, any person bound by such service, although he may not have been named in the bill of exceptions. Park’s Ann. Code, § 6164 (b); Toole v. Geer, 12 Ga. App. 409 (77 S. E. 368). Accordingly, in the ease under consideration, the plaintiff in error is allowed to amend the bill of exceptions by inserting, after" the words C. B. Adams, the words “executor of Jas. E. Laidler, deceased,” so that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Judge of the Cooper Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  2. Toole v. GeerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. McAfee & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Woodard v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. United States Casualty Co. v. Peachtree Roxboro Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Cleland v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API