Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Pegram

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1915No. 9142PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Hon. C. J. Ramage, special Judge, Florence, Action by J. W. Holliday against G. H. Pegram and C. W. Payne, copartners in trade, under the firm name of G. H. Pegram & Co. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal: submit: Allegation of contract is irrelevant in action on quantum meruit: 94 S. C. 406; and should have been stricken out: 71 S. C. 340; 64 S. C. 509; 54 S. C. 95; 18 S. C. 479; 80 S. C. 499; 18 S. C. 479; 71 S. C. 7; Pom. Rem.

Read the full summary

Before Hon. C. J. Ramage, special Judge, Florence, Action by J. W. Holliday against G. H. Pegram and C. W. Payne, copartners in trade, under the firm name of G. H. Pegram & Co. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal: submit: Allegation of contract is irrelevant in action on quantum meruit: 94 S. C. 406; and should have been stricken out: 71 S. C. 340; 64 S. C. 509; 54 S. C. 95; 18 S. C. 479; 80 S. C. 499; 18 S. C. 479; 71 S. C. 7; Pom. Rem. (2d ed.), secs. 551, 552; 2 Wait. Pr. 437. submit: An order refusing to strike out irrelevant matter is not appeal-able: 74 S. C. 13; 77 S. C.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

At first, plaintiff sued on contract to recover the rent due for the use of a warehouse. A directed verdict for plaintiff was reversed on the ground, besides others, that the Court erred in holding that the letters introduced to prove the contract made a complete contract. 89 S. C. 73, 71 S. E. 367, Ann. Cas. 1913a, 33.

The case was remanded for a new trial, which was had without amendment of the complaint- — plaintiff still suing upon contract. On the second trial, the Court directed a verdict for defendants on the ground that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holliday v. PegramSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Holliday v. G. H. Pegram & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rainwater v. HobiekaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  2. Gantt v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. McConnell v. CROCKERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API