Reed v. Angiodynamics, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION TAMMY REED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 2:23-cv-04066-MDH ) ANGIODYNAMICS, INC. & NAVILYST, ) MEDICAL, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 37). Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint arguing Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations, that Plaintiff fails to state a claim, and that Plaintiff’s fraud claim is inadequately pled. The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for review. BACKGROUND…