In re the Contest of the November 8, 2005 General Election
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Rivera-Soto
To the extent the majority “do[es] not adopt the Appellate Division’s view that our modern pleading rules can be engrafted onto the [election contest] statute’s requirements so as to permit the [election contest] petition to be equated with a complaint, and therefore to be tested against liberal notice pleading coneepts[,]” ante at 570, 934 A.2d at 621, I concur. However, because the majority’s holding is premised on an incorrect impeachment of prior precedent and a failure to comply with the trial court’s lawful order, I respectfully dissent.
I
This appeal requires that we examine the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wene v. MeynerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Kilmurray v. GilfertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Velazquez Ex Rel. Velazquez v. JiminezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- In Re Gray-SadlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.