Legal Opinion

Carrick v. Franchise Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 27, 1995No. 94-637PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff Sandra Carrick appeals from an order of the Rutland Superior Court granting summary judgment to defendants on plaintiff’s claims of franchisor liability under the Dram Shop Act, 7 V.S.A. §§ 501-507. We affirm.

*419The facts are not in dispute. On the evening of January 16, 1991, Shawn C. Forrest was a customer at the Plug & Feather Lounge in Rutland. Over the course of approximately four hours, employees of the Plug & Feather served Mr. Forrest eight mixed drinks, which he consumed. Mr. Forrest then left the Plug & Feather and, while driving south on Route 7 at a high rate of speed, ran…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Times Mirror, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Estate of Kelley v. Moguls, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Banks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Bennett v. LetterlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. State v. McDermottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knight v. RowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. State v. BeauchampSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API