Legal Opinion

People v. Stephen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 9, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s contention that the resentencing provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738, §§ 1-41) violate his right to equal protection of the laws (NY Const, art I, §11; US Const, 14th Amend) and that he was subject to cruel and unusual punishment by the application of those provisions is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Vasquez, 54 *783AD3d 783 [2008] [decided herewith]; People v Duke, 40 AD3d 872 [2007]), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]; People v Baumann & Sons Buses, Inc., 6 NY3d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. FelixNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. Baumann & Sons Buses, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People v. DukeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API