Legal Opinion

Ellington v. Garrow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 2007No. 03CV0398AB; A130169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

In this personal injury action that resulted in a jury verdict for plaintiff, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion for a directed verdict in which she challenged the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence that his claimed physical therapy expenses were reasonably and necessarily incurred. Because we conclude that plaintiffs evidence was sufficient to establish that the amount of such expenses was reasonably and necessarily incurred, we affirm the jury’s award of such damages.

In reviewing the denial of a motion for a directed verdict, we view the facts and all…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Woodbury v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Tuohy v. Columbia Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Rathgeber v. James Hemenway, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Coblentz v. JaloffOregon Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McClellandCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. White v. Jubitz Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Martinez v. Delgado-GalbanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API