Legal Opinion

Weil & Brother v. Pope

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Chancery Court of Madison. Heard before Hon. H. C. Speake. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtManning, J.

Appellees, Sarah E. Pope and her husband, John Pope, and Wade H. Blankenship and his wife, Ella Blankenship, filed their bill to enjoin appellants, Weil & Brother, from proceeding, by their action of unlawful detainer, to put complainants out of the possession of certain real estate in Madison county — 137 acres of land, with the appurtenances — and to have set aside and annulled a deed thereof, made by complainants to Weil & Brother, on the 19th of January, 1874, on allegations in the bill that an absolute deed was fraudulently obtained, instead of a mortgage, Avhich complainants say they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Durden v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. O'Neal v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
  3. Bibb v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869
  4. Rogers v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thames & Co. v. Rembert's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Addington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Prince v. PrinceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Sikes v. ShowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API