Legal Opinion

State v. Jordan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2010No. 2008-2119 and 2008-2172Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Jordan, 124 Ohio St.3d 397,

2010-Ohio-281.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. JORDAN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Jordan, 124 Ohio St.3d 397,

2010-Ohio-281.] To obtain a conviction for escape under R.C. 2921.34(A)(1), the state may prove that the defendant was subject to postrelease control without proving that during a sentencing hearing the trial court orally notified the defendant that he would be subject to postrelease control. (Nos. 2008-2119 and 2008-2172 — Submitted October 21, 2009 — Decided February 4, 2010.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Marion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hernandez v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Romito v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API