Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Regional Dialysis of Anniston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1985No. 84-1280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By denying the petition, we do not intend to be understood as agreeing that administrative agencies are restricted by the Administrative Procedure Act, §§ 41-22-1, et seq., Code 1975, to legal rules of evidence. The Act itself provides:

"[T]he rules of evidence as applied in nonjury civil cases in the circuit courts of this state shall be followed. When necessary to ascertain facts not reasonably susceptible of proof under those rules, evidence not admissible thereunder may be admitted (except where precluded by statute) if it is of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Regional Dialysis v. NE ALA. KIDNEY CLINICCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sylacauga Health Care Center, Inc. v. Alabama State Health Planning AgencyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Clark v. FancherCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Nursing Home of Dothan, Inc. v. SHPACourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Huntsville Healthcare Center, Inc. v. Brown Health Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API