Defender Ass'n of Philadelphia Amendment of Articles of Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Pomeroy,
We are presented by this appeal with the question whether the work of the Defender Association of Philadelphia in affording legal representation to indigent persons accused of crime will be compromised and rendered constitutionally ineffective by reason of the sub*355stantial representation of the City of Philadelphia in the management of the Association. Specifically, does a potential 50% degree of control of the governing board of the Association by the City serve automatically to deprive the indigent client of competent, disinterested counsel?
The Defender…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Isaacs v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TEMPLE UNIV., ETC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Com. v. Marshall, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Marshall, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. WestbrookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WestbrookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976