Legal Opinion

Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. Karr

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1998No. Docket Nos. 200274, 200276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, J.

In these consolidated cases involving plaintiff’s duty to defend defendants Calvin E. Karr and Jayne H. Mohr under a homeowner’s insurance policy, defendants appeal as of right from a trial court order granting summary disposition to plaintiff pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) (no genuine issue with respect to any material fact). We affirm.

Defendants Calvin E. Karr and Jayne H. Mohr were insured under a homeowner’s insurance policy issued by plaintiff. Defendants Richard L. Aho, Cindy L. Aho, and John A. Rolando (“buyers”) purchased a house in Marquette, Michigan, from defendants Karr and Mohr…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Illinois Employers Insurance v. DragovichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Group v. Coloma TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Fitch v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MICH. ED. EMP. MUT. INS. CO. v. KarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API