Legal Opinion

Philson v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1958No. 34402PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a suit by a taxpayer of the city of Omaha. In his first cause of action he prays for a declaratory judgment determining his rights, status, and legal relations with reference to Ordinances Nos. 18515 and 18743 of the city of Omaha and proceedings had thereunder; that such ordinances be declared null, void, and unenforcible; and that the specifications for improvements in Special Improvement District No. 5116 insofar as they contain a requirement for a minimum wage be declared null, void, and unenforcible. In his second cause of action the plaintiff prays for injunctive relief against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wagner v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bohn v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Frame v. FelixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Marshall & Bruce Co. v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hillig v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. Rath v. City of SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Midwest Employers Council, Inc. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Parish Council of Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Louisiana Highway & Heavy Branch of Associated General Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Associated Gen. Contractors v. Calcasieu Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API