Legal Opinion
Carrozza v. Galleria Mall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 26, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered January 5, 2001, which granted defendants’ motion for a change of venue from New York County to Westchester County, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the motion denied.
In support of their motion to change venue for the promotion of the convenience of material witnesses (CPLR 510 [3]), defendants duly provided their proposed witnesses’ names and addresses (see, Leopold v Goldstein, 283 AD2d 319, 320). However, “[t]o establish inconvenience of witnesses it is necessary at least to contact them”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leopold v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- MacRobbie v. OlivioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Marcott Pharmacy North Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Jacobs v. Banks Shapiro Gettinger Waldinger & Brennan, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Hernandez v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Montero v. Elrac, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Goldberg v. BivinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002