Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1992No. 3-90-111-CRPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury found appellant guilty of driving while intoxicated, third offense. Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6701/-l(e) (Supp.1991). The jury found that another person suffered serious bodily injury as a direct result of the offense, and assessed punishment at imprisonment for five years and a $2500 fine. Art. 6701Z-l(f). The jury also made an affirmative finding that appellant used a deadly weapon, the automobile, during the commission of the offense.

Appellant contends that the indictment did not allege a felony offense and that the district court was without jurisdiction as a consequence. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Ex parte JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McKithanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Kenneth Lee Douds v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  3. Rachuig v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  4. St. Clair v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API