Legal Opinion
Levin Metals Corp. v. Parr-Richmond Terminal Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 21, 1986No. C-84-6273 SCPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS
CONTI, District Judge.
This is an action for damages and declaratory relief brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9657 (1984). Plaintiffs allege that the defendants were the owners and operators of a shipping terminal in Richmond, California at the time the shipping terminal was contaminated with hazardous wastes.
The matter is presently before the court on defendant Parr Industrial Corporation’s (“PIC’s”) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim against it pursuant to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- United States v. a & F Materials Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1984
- United States v. PriceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- Bishop v. Schield Bantam CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1968
- Gonzalez v. Progressive Tool & Die Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Levin Metals Corp. v. Parr-Richmond Terminal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Sharon Steel Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1987
- Levin Metals Corp. v. Parr-Richmond Terminal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Pacific Scene, Inc. v. Penasquitos, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re RegO Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.