Legal Opinion

Bick v. Haidle

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1971No. 11866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Has Well

In a contract action to recover money allegedly due plaintiff from defendants, the district court of Yellowstone County granted defendants’ motion for change of venue to the county of defendants’ residence. From this order plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff and appellant is Hal W. Bick, doing business as Bick Irrigation Systems, whose principal place of business is Billings, Yellowstone County, Montana, Defendants and respondents are Lynn Haidle, Bill Haidle and Irvin Haidle, lifelong residents of Prairie County, Montana, who operate a family farm there.

On June 7, 1968, plaintiff and defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hardenburgh v. HardenburghMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Fraser v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Love v. Mon-O-Co Oil Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. McGregor v. SvareMontana Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foley v. General Motors Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. VikenMontana Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API