Legal Opinion

Kroening v. Kroening

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

On June 4, 1917, Charles and Augusta Kroening, being then the owners of the farm in question and of all the personal property thereon, conveyed' both real estate and personal property to the plaintiff, Walter Kroening, taking back a bond of support which in addition to the usual details of such a contract obligated the grantee.to' pay to each of his five brothers the sum of $500. The due dates upon these obligations ran from five to twelve years from date. Walter Kroening entered possession of the farm and personal property and carried out the agreement for support until February 8, 1919. On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Glocke v. GlockeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Gilchrist v. FoxenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Wanner v. WannerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Wetutzke v. WetutzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moffatt v. MoffattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Manning v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API