State v. Jones
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ESPINOSA, J.
The defendant, Marquis Jones, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of felony murder in connection with the death of the victim, Horace Cheatham. The defendant claims that (1) prosecutorial impropriety during closing argument deprived him of his due process right to a fair trial and (2) this court should exercise its supervisory authority and grant him a new trial as a result of the prosecutor’s improper closing argument. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On the basis of the evidence presented at trial, the jury reasonably could have found…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. James G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. CamachoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CrumpConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Jones v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Jones v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
- State v. PaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.