Legal Opinion

Fauver v. Fleenor

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

FROM SULLIVAN. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Blountsville. H. C. Smith, Ch.

1Opinion of the Court

Deaeeeick, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of the court.

The petition for rehearing by defendant, Rebecca, has been examined. It insists that the complainant bought the land of defendant, Jas. A.. Fleenor, the husband of said Rebecca, and took assignment of his title bond, and because this purchase was ineffectual to convey the right of homestead, it was a fraud, and complainant took no interest in the land.

It. is true that the assignment of the title bond, as declared in the former opinion, did not deprive the wife of the right of homestead, yet it did authorize the vendor of Fleenor to convey to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walters v. WaltersTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API