Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Lovett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 8, 1935No. 23927PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
Under the rulings of the Supreme Court in Cato v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 164 Ga. 392 (2) (138 S. E. 787), reaffirmed in Prudential Ins. Co. v. South, 179 Ga. 653 (177 S. E. 499), the jury, under the evidence, were fully authorized to find that the plaintiff was totally and permanently disabled, within the meaning of the provision in the group policy upon which suit was brought, that “any employee shall be considered totally and permanently disabled who furnishes due proof to the company that, while insured thereunder and prior to his 60th birthday, he has become so disabled, as a result of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. WorleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SouthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Realty Bond & Mortgage Co. v. HarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Cowdery v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Georgia-Carolina Brick & Tile Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- New York Life Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- American Casualty Co. v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Canal Insurance Co. v. Winge Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- CIMARRON INSURANCE CO., INC. v. PaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.