Legal Opinion
Myers v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1900No. 569PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Error to tlie Circuit' Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This was an action at law for the alleged infringement of two patents, — one. a mechanical patent, reissue No. 11,388, and the other a design patent, No. 22,911, — both issued to the plaintiff in error for a lamp stove. The validity of these patents was involved in the suit of Gaskill v. Myers, 26 C. C. A. 642, 81 Fed. 854, and there sustained. In the present action the sole defense interposed by the defendants was noninfringement, and based upon the claim that the stoves sold by them constituting the alleged infringement were of a different make, style, pattern, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wilson v. EverettSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Myers v. SternheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Gaskill v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Pac. Co. v. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Napier v. GreenzweigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- American Sales Book Co. v. BullivantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Ricketts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929