Legal Opinion

Maud v. Wear

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Sixteenth District Court, County of Kern. Reed, J. The facts are stated in the opinion. ,

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.;

The judgment in this case must be reversed.

The summons was served on one of the defendants on the 7th, and on the other on the 8th of October, 1879, and on the 11th day of the same month their default was entered. Neither of the defendants answered, and the summons, with the affidavit or proof of service, and the complaint, with a memorandum indorsed thereon that the default of the defendants in not answer*26ing was entered, constitute a part of the judgment roll; and the question whether there was error in the entry of the default of the defendants before the expiration of ten…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burt v. ScrantomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pickerill v. StrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. (HC) Purtill v. CovelloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API